System Bug Fix для Windows
System Bug Fix — небольшая утилита, которая поможет вам устранить последствия вирусов, троянов и червей. Исправляет и ставит запрет на редактирование файла hosts. Удаляет нежелательное ПО и разнообразные типы malware. Увеличивает производительность системы, снимает блокировку диспетчера задач, чистит кэши браузеров и удаляет программы «защитники», такие как: Яндекс Защитник, Qip Guard, Mail Guard. Ставит запрет на доступ из сети к вашему компьютеру. Содержит ряд полезных функций, среди которых, возможность смены стартовой страницы в браузере, если это невозможно сделать в ручную и включение режим бога в Windows Vista и Windows 7. Кроме того System Bug Fix позволяет проверить компьютер на наличие запущенных вредоносных процессов, спрятать файл hosts от вирусов, а также способна показать программы, находящиеся в автозагрузке.
- добавлена система сканирования вредоносных процессов по базе
- добавлен просмотр приложений из автозагрузки
- добавлен просмотр скрытых пользователей системы
- добавлен запрет автозапуска со сменных носителей
- в пункте Вы сможете спрятать его, и важные файлы связанные с ним, от вирусов
- доработана функция «Восстановление ассоциаций файлов»
- исправлено — при выборе программа сначала сделает его резервную копию
- оптимизирована функция
- другие мелкие исправления
ТОП-сегодня раздела «Настройка, оптимизация»
CCleaner — популярное приложение для оптимизации ПК, чистки реестра и удаления различного.
MSI Afterburner — настоящая находка для истинного оверклокера, с помощью которой можно.
Mem Reduct — небольшая портативная утилита, которая позволяет высвободить до 25% используемой.
Простой в использовании твикер для Windows, с помощью которого можно быстро и легко.
CCleaner Portable — портативная (переносная, не требующая инсталляции на компьютер) версия утилиты CCleaner для чистки системного мусора.
Process Hacker — мощное приложение для полного контроля над задачами, процессами и службами, с.
Отзывы о программе System Bug Fix
Голодранец! про System Bug Fix 1.2 [03-10-2011]
Спасибо большое Антон за ответ
3 | 3 | Ответить
(ерж про System Bug Fix 1.2 [02-10-2011]
Заявленные возможности программы с «весом» в 123 КВ не внушает доверия, тем более, текст сайта разработчика имеет ошибки. Устанавливать опасаюсь, оценка WOT в зоне риска. Подожду оценок сведующих пользователей.
3 | 3 | Ответить
Антон про System Bug Fix 1.1 [28-09-2011]
Нет, не нарушит.
Данная программа никоем образом не работает с процессом или службой svchost.
3 | 3 | Ответить
Голодранец! [ меня давно про System Bug Fix 1.1 [23-09-2011]
Судя по описанию программа супер.. Только вот у меня вопрос я не уверен был у меня ВИрус SVCHOST.exe, если нет то не нарушит ли данная программа целостность СЕРВИСА svchost ?
3 | 3 | Ответить
Bug Fixing in Production: an Inside Look
Interview
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- When things come crashing down
- An insider’s perspective to bug fixing in production
- Conclusion
Introduction
Building an application is one thing and providing support when it’s up and running is a whole different ball game that has its own set of challenges.
In a perfect world, the code that is rolled out at the end of each sprint would work perfectly in production. There would never be any bugs, and there would never be any issues that force developers to roll back the code that had already been deployed.
Of course, we don’t live in a perfect world. And software development is always fraught with various bugs. Especially when there is a large team working on a project.
The main task of such a team is to release the application without a single bug. However, even with a team of testers, various bugs may appear even at the production stage, so you need to have some kind of fixing plan.
When things come crashing down
Handling errors within the production phase can be tricky, and the production environment isn’t every developer’s cup of tea. Not to mention, oftentimes there is no documentation available, and the developers are called in for troubleshooting support with little to no knowledge about the application.
It’s needless to say, that errors in applications could lead to software downtimes, which lead to loss of revenue and reputation. The Gartner analysts have estimated that the average cost of downtime is $5,600 per minute — that’s well over $300,000 per hour.
Here are some real-life examples of big downtimes:
Skype
Skype experienced its first major downtime in August 2007: for two days straight, users could neither call nor send messages. The reason was a problem with the algorithm working with the network software. At that time, the market capitalization of Skype’s owner, the online auction service eBay, fell by $1 billion on the first day of the outage. Their quotes on the New York Stock Exchange fell by 7% – from $36.2% to $33.64 per share.
Google Cloud
On June 2, 2019, Google Cloud Platform experienced a significant network outage that impacted services hosted in parts of US West, US East, and US Central regions. This outage impacted Google’s applications, including GSuite and YouTube. The outage lasted more than four hours, which became notable given the criticality of Google’s services to business customers. Google issued an official report on the incident several days later.
The complete unavailability of parts of Google’s network turned out to be due to Google’s network control plane inadvertently getting taken offline. Google later revealed that during the outage period, a set of automated policies determined which services were reachable through the unaffected parts of its network.
A week after Forbes ranked Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg above Steve Jobs on the list of the richest Americans, the social network suffered a major disruption. By the fall of 2010, the number of registered Facebook users exceeded 500 million, and the fall of the social network was a public shock, becoming the main news of the day.
Facebook’s management detailed the reasons for the incident: an automatic system that looks for incorrect settings considered the changes made to the main network base an error. So, a massive correction of “errors” began, and the servers were overloaded with hundreds of thousands of requests per second.
An insider’s perspective to bug fixing in production
We met with Andrei Vorobjov, the Lead QA Engineer at Bamboo Agile, experienced in testing projects of any complexity and scale, to discuss all the subtleties that go into bug fixing during the production stage.
Describe your experience of dealing with software testing in production.
How does the common process of bug fixing in production vary in various companies?
– The attitude towards bug fixing in production as an element of the software development process strictly depends on the type of product the company develops. In software module development, bugs came at a high cost – not only financially, but first and foremost, reputationally. That was because the client could lose money right after the release, which would lead to the contractor having to provide refunds, discounts, perks, etc. to smooth over the situation.
All those potential costs made companies hire the departments of professional support managers and maintain separate teams focused solely on bug fixing in production.
Such a system works well, and my first company usually handled it in the following way:
1. The user finds a bug in an e-Commerce application (an online store) and informs the store about it, describing the bug in detail.
2. An online store (in this case, the client of a software development team) reports and describes the bug to the support department.
3. The support department informs the QA department about the bug for its reproduction. The latter is needed to understand the bug’s nature and whether it’s global or local.
4. After reproducing the bug and identifying it as global, a QA engineer describes and sends it to the team responsible for bug fixing.
5. After fixing, the bug is taken back to retesting. Then, the fix is released in case of the bug being global (the fix could also go directly to the client that purchased the module if the bug was identified as local).
Everything seems transparent and simple. But are there any hidden pitfalls involved in this process?
– That’s true, there are plenty of downsides. For example, there’s the effect of Chinese whispers due to the constant rewriting of reproduction steps and a long communication process causing some bugs to get lost. But we have to commend that any rule has its exceptions, therefore, the bugs fixed by a single comma wouldn’t have that long of a way to go, and would be quickly delivered to the development team.
How has the testing process changed now, and what are the obstacles to seamless testing that can still be met?
– Currently, while working on a product that doesn’t affect anyone’s direct costs (meaning no significant loss for clients’ businesses), we focus on the bug’s nature for an individual user, since in this case, any bug would be global. In the existing system, we follow the principle of the release of bugs in clusters (once again, excluding the critical ones). This allows not only to focus on the ongoing development without distracting the team (due to the absence of a separate team to work on fixes) but to optimize the work by comprising the releases primarily from the bugs fixed. But even here you can find new downsides, and the lack of time is the most crucial one. In the context of testing, the engineer can lack access to production and an opportunity to properly test the fix after the release.
What conclusion have you reached for yourself after working in such different places, and what advice can you give to others?
– As a tester, I’ve seen the importance of bug criticality on a global level and have found out that not all bugs were as frightening as the client saw them. Each company tries to optimize the process of dealing with bug fixing in production. That’s why whether you have the processes aligned or missing completely, I’d advise remembering the following:
- a tester is able to veto the release of an unreliable product – of course, with the explanation of this decision. This allows us to avoid some bugs in production.
- you cannot rely upon common sense while making decisions on bug fixing. If the bug is not worth it, it’s probably much better to put it on hold for a while or, on the contrary, to fix it fast by bypassing the bedevilled process mechanisms.
Conclusion
All in all, bug fixing in production is an unavoidable part of software development. While the process itself may be difficult and confusing, there are multiple ways to make the task easier for the development team. Great attention to detail, clear communication, and a well-defined troubleshooting strategy are all amazing assets in the programmers’ eternal battle against bugs.
How useful was this post?
Click on a star to rate it!
Best Bug Fixing Software
Best bug fixing software like Bugasura, inVivoStat, and MantisBT are those that help in repairing the bugs in the software without human intervention. Such tools are of immense help to developers and testers in fixing the software bugs.
Get Free Demo
Connect With Your Personal Advisor
Featured Software
Bugasura
Simple, Fast, and collaborative Bug Reporting and
InVivoStat
Jira
Software by Atlassian
Bugzilla
List of 20 Best Bug Fixing Software
Showing 1 — 20 of 13 products
Bugasura
Simple, Fast, and collaborative Bug Reporting and
Bugasura is a simple, fast, and collaborative bug-tracking platform. It is built by keeping a team consisting of developers, QA, designers, and product managers in mind. Its customized workflows and ability to work across teams make it a unique bug-tracking product. Learn more about Bugasura
Starting Price: $10 5 Users/Month
Free Demo Get Pricing
High Performer | 2023
InVivoStat
InVivoStat is a powerful, free to use, statistical software package, its statistics engine. It is designed specifically for scientists conducting animal experiments. Read InVivoStat Reviews
Starting Price: Available on Request
Free Demo Get Pricing
Jira
Software by Atlassian
Jira is a issue tracking software, developed by Atlassian. It provides bug tracking, issue tracking, and project management feature for small, medium and large team. Read Jira Reviews
Starting Price: Available on Request
Free Demo Get Pricing
Most Reviewed
Jira’s Pros and Cons
Jira is a bug tracking and project management software. Its primary purpose in life is to help with Manage Agile and Scrum teams, Organize your project tasks, Capture and record software bugs, and JIRA features as Powerful agile views, Scrum boards, Kanban board, custom workflows and detailed report generation and it’s very to use in among all team members
I cherish the highlight of kanban sheets, particularly I am a individual who adores the aesthetics of something, so kanban sheets have made a difference me distinguish the foremost imperative things and prioritize my work without clutter. Jira makes a difference me keep track of all the issue tickets that have been relegated to me, the reason of the dashboard is self-evident, all your ventures, relegated tickets, continuous issues and favorite channels are kept in a partitioned segment. You’ll check the status of your tickets straightforwardly from the dashboard or the ticket points of interest page, on the ticket subtle elements page, you’ll be able include a comment, tag somebody, start/stop advance, alter the ticket status utilizing various strategies and much more. After you make a alter to a Jira ticket, an programmed mail is sent to the fitting individual to let them know, from the ticket points of interest page, we are able effectively adjust the assignee and relegate the issue ticket to anybody, Jira makes it simple for you to administration of your ventures.
While we are managing multiple sprints and other elements of the projects, it’s very difficult to manage the labels and other aspects. Jira could improve the workflow, screen, and field configurability.
The as it were feedback I have is that Jira doesn’t inform you in the event that you take off a Jira ticket open and somebody else makes a alter, you’ll get an obscure token mistake and got to reload the page in the event that you attempt to upgrade the ticket afterward. Now and then the framework feels as well customizable and the streams can get exceptionally complex to set up.
При подготовке материала использовались источники:
https://www.softportal.com/software-22882-system-bug-fix.html
https://www.softwaresuggest.com/bug-fixing-software